Gnoseology of human sciences and production of intelligence knowledge

Authors

  • Henrique Geaquinto Herkenhoff

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58960/rbi.2023.18.234

Keywords:

cognitive bias; Intelligence analysis; Intelligence failures

Abstract

It analyzes the impact and consequences of cognitive biases in the knowledge production process of intelligence activity, mainly under the understanding that cognition implies giving meaning to what is perceived and integrating it into a timely and useful whole for the decision of the policy makers. Based on recent contributions on the topic, goes through the strategies used to identify and mitigate the effects of cognitive biases and their true effectiveness in the work of intelligence analysts, mainly about the products resulting from their cognitive effort. It addresses, even without extension, the gnoseology of science, the claim of participation of human “sciences” and the contextualization of these with the activity of intelligence, reaching aspects of the conscious and unconscious process applied in the production of knowledge of intelligence and its purposes. Discusses strategies for risk management of human cognition, presenting alternatives that can encourage the work of intelligence agencies, mainly in the activity of analyzing information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVES, Rubem. Filosofia da Ciência, 13. ed. São Paulo: ed. Brasiliense, 1990.

AMBROS, Christiano; LODETTI, Daniel. Vieses cognitivos na Atividade de Inteligência: conceitos, categorias e métodos de mitigação. Revista Brasileira de Inteligência. Brasília: Abin, n. 14, dez. 2019.

BARBER, Paul J.; LEGGE, David. Percepção e informação. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1976.

BODNAR, John W. Warning analysis fir the information age: rethinking the intelligence process. Washington (DC) Joint Military Intelligence College, 2003.

CARMELLO, Eduardo. O poder da informação intuitiva. São Paulo: Ed. Gente, 2000.

CLAUSEWITZ, Carl von. Da guerra: a arte da estratégia. São Paulo: Tahyu, 2005.

CRAWFORD, Kate. The Hidden Biases in Big Data. Harvard Business Review. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2013/04/the-hidden-biases-in-big-data. Acesso em: 7 jun. 2020.

CRAWFORD, Kate; CALO, Ryan. There is a blind spot in AI research. NATURE, vol. 538. 20 October 2016. Disponível em: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/538311a.pdf. Acesso em: 7 de jun. 2020.

DEMO, Pedro. Certeza da incerteza: ambivalências do conhecimento e da vida. Brasília, Ed. Plano, 2000.

DOWLING, Thomas. Failures of imagination: thoughts on the 9/11Comission Report, in Learning with professionals. Washington (DC): Joint Military Intelligence College, 2005.

FEARN, Nicholas. Aprendendo a filosofar em 25 lições. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2004.

FERNANDEZ, Antonio M. Díaz (Director). Espionaje para políticos. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2016.

FREIRE-MAIA, Newton. A ciência por dentro. 2. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1990.

GUNTHER, Max. Os axiomas de Zurique. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Record, 2013.

HEUER JUNIOR, Richards J. Psychology of intelligence analysis. Center for the Study in Intelligence. CIA, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.cia.gov/library. Acesso em: 30 set. 2018.

HOLT, Pat M. Secret Intelligence and public policy: A dilema of democracy. Washington (DC): CQ Press, 1994.

JUNG, Carl Gustav... (et al.) O Homem e seus símbolos. 17ª impressão. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1999.

LENTIN, Jean-Pierre. Penso, logo me engano: breve história do besteirol científico, 4. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 1997.

LOWENTHAL, Mark M. Intelligence. 6 ed. Washington (DC): Sage/CQPress, 2015.

MARTIN, Alain Paul. Harnessing the power of Intelligence, Counterintelligence & surprise events. Canada: Executive dot org, 2002.

MENEZES, Djacir. O problema da realidade objetiva. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro/MEC, 1971.

NIETZSCHE, Friedrich W. A gaia ciência. 3. ed. São Paulo: Hemus, 1981.

O’NEILL Catherine. Weapons of Math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Brodway Books, 2016.

PENNA, Antônio Gomes. Cognitivismo, consciência e comportamento político. São Paulo: Vértice, 1986.

PIAGET, Jean. Sabedoria e ilusões da filosofia, in A epistemologia genética [...]. São Paulo, Abril Cultural, 1978.

POPPER, Karl Raimund. A lógica da pesquisa científica. 2 ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2013a.

POPPER, Karl Raimund. Os dois problemas fundamentais da teoria do conhecimento. São Paulo, Ed. UNESP, 2013b.

ROSITO, Guilherme Augusto. Abordagem fenomenológica e metodologia de produção de conhecimentos, in Revista Brasileira de Inteligência. Brasília: Abin, v. 2, n. 3, set. 2006.

RUSSEL, Bertrand. A perspectiva científica. 3. ed. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1969.

SCHULSKY, Abram N. Silent warfare: understanding de world of intelligence. Washignton (DC): Brassey’s US, 1991.

SINCLAIR, Robert S. Thinking and writing: cognitive science and Intelligence analysis. Washington (DC): Center for the Study of Intelligence, 2010.

TEIXEIRA, João Fernandes. Filosofia do Cérebro. São Paulo: Paulus, 2012.

TURNER, Michael A. Why secret Intelligence fails. Dulles (Virginia): Totomac Books, 2005.

VELASCO, Fernando; NAVARRO, Diego; ARCOS, Rubén (eds.) La Inteligência como disciplina científica. Madrid: Plaza y Valdes ed./Ministerio de Defensa, 2008.

VICENTINI, Max Rogério. Como percebemos o mundo que nos cerca? Bauru: EDUSC, 1999.

ZEGART, Amy B. Spying Blind: the CIA, the FBI and the origins of 9/11. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton Universty Press, 2007.

Published

2023-10-27

How to Cite

Geaquinto Herkenhoff, Henrique. 2023. “Gnoseology of Human Sciences and Production of Intelligence Knowledge”. Brazilian Journal of Intelligence, no. 18 (October). Brasília, Brasil:229-44. https://doi.org/10.58960/rbi.2023.18.234.

Most read articles by the same author(s)