Gobernanza algorítmica y ética en la Inteligencia: un análisis de las iniciativas emergentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58960/rbi.2026.21.291Palabras clave:
gobernanza algorítmica, Inteligencia Artificial, toma de decisiones, algoritmos, sesgosResumen
Los sistemas de información y la IA están presentes en diversos aspectos de la vida cotidiana. Sin embargo, esta exposición digital posibilita la recopilación masiva de datos sobre hábitos y decisiones personales, sin consentimiento explícito de usuarios, los cuales pueden utilizarse para elaboración de perfiles, sistemas de recomendación y prevención del delito. No obstante, los sistemas que procesan estos datos no son inmunes a sesgos, lo que puede afectar derechos humanos, privacidad y libertad de expresión. En este contexto, la gobernanza algorítmica busca promover una mayor transparencia, ética y rendición de cuentas en las decisiones automatizadas. Este trabajo objetiva analizar iniciativas de gobernanza algorítmica y de inteligencia artificial orientadas a la mitigación de problemas derivados de sesgos y discriminación.
Descargas
Citas
Aneesh, Anup. 2006. Virtual Migration: The Programming of Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822387534
Austin Jr., Roy; Fried, Ina. 2023. “Meta’s new yardstick for testing algorithmic bias”. Axios, 9 mar. 2023. https://www.axios.com/2023/03/09/algorithmic-bias-meta-dataset-face-recognition
Bellamy, Rachel K. E., et al. 2018. “AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01943
Brasil. 2020. Projeto de Lei nº 2.630/2020. https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/141944.
Brasil. 2023. Projeto de Lei n° 2.338/2023. https:// www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/157233
Brasil. 2024a. Lei nº 16.321/2024. https://leismunicipais.com.br/a/pr/c/curitiba/lei-ordinaria/2024/1633/16321
Brasil. 2024b. PL nº 2.970/2024. https://mail.camara.rj.gov.br/APL/Legislativos/scpro.nsf/ab87ae0e15e7dddd0325863200569395/03258c16006f052703258ae6006571b4?OpenDocument
Brasil. 2024c. Projeto de Lei nº 210. https://legis.senado.leg.br/sdleg-getter/documento?disposition=inline&dm=9543976&ts=1738768205705
Brasil. 2025. Instrução Normativa PGM nº 003/2025. https://dopaonlineupload.procempa.com.br/dopaonlineupload/5567_ce_20250228_executivo.pdf
Brisola, A.; Bezerra, A. C. 2018. “Desinformação e Circulação de Fake News: distinções, diagnóstico e reação”. Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação – ENANCIB – XIX. Ed. ANCIB, pp. 3316–3330. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/102819
Cabrera, Ángel Alexander, et al. 2019. “FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learning”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST47406.2019.8986948
Cooper, F. R. 2014. “Always Already Suspect: Revising Vulnerability Theory”. North Carolina Law Review 93.
Doneda, Danilo, e Almeida, Virgílio A. F. (2016). “What Is Algorithm Governance?”. *Internet Governance*, IEEE Computer Society, 1089-7801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2016.79
De Mello, F. C. O., e Scheinder, M. (2021). “Desinformação Digital em Rede e Competência Crítica em Informação”. *International Review of Information Ethics*, Vol. 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/irie408
Deutsch, William et al. (2015). “FairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications”. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02377. Acesso em: 02 out. 2025.
Dignum, Virginia. 2019. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6
Errey-Hammond, M. 2024. Big Data, Emerging Technologies and Intelligence. Abingdon: Routledge.
Floridi, Luciano; Cowls, Josh. 2019. “A unified framework of five principles for AI in society”. Harvard Data Science Review, Cambridge, v. 1, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Ford, C.; Vogel, K. 2025. Will AI Save Us?: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Intelligence Analysis. In: US Intelligence Failure and Knowledge Creation: Improving Intelligence Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003472926
Gillespie, Tarleton. (2018). *Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media*. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
Issar, S., e Aneesh, A. (2021). “What is Algorithmic Governance?”. Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12955
Iwan-Sojka, D. (2025). “The inclusive data governance models for algorithms”. *Information, Communication & Society*, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1–20. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2024.2406668. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2025.
Junqueira, A. H., e Botelho-Francisco, R. (2021). “Raça: Dimensão Interseccional das Vulnerabilidades Digitais”. *Contemporanea – Revista de Comunicação e Cultura*, v. 19, n. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/contemporanea.v19i3.45899
Katzenbach, C., e Ulbricht, L. (2019). “Algorithmic Governance”. *Internet Policy Review – Journal on Internet Regulation*, v. 8, n. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1424
Lovatto, M. Betiele Aude. (2024). “Inteligência Artificial: Governança e Transparência?”. *Revista Ibmec de Direito*, 1(1). Disponível em: https://ibmec.periodicoscientificos.com.br/index.php/cienciajuridica/article/view/245. Acesso em: 05 out. 2025.
Luna, F. (2009). “Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels”. *The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (Spring)*, Vol. 2, No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121
Lyon, D. (2014). “Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique”. *Big Data & Society*, 1(2). Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053951714541861. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
Malgieri, G., e Niklas, J. (2020). “Vulnerable Data Subjects”. *Computer Law & Security Review*, 37. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105415
Mishra, Neha et al. (2022). “D-BIAS: Human-in-the-Loop Debiasing for Tabular Data Using Causal Models”. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05126. Acesso em: 05 out. 2025.
Müller-Birn, C., Herbsleb, J., e Dobusch, L. (2013). “Work-to-Rule: The Emergence of Algorithmic Governance in Wikipedia”. *Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies*, 80–89. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2482991.2482999. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2482999
O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.
O’Reilly, T. (2013). “Open Data and Algorithmic Regulation”. Em B. Goldstein & L. Dyson (eds.), *Beyond Transparency: Open Data and the Future of Civic Innovation* (pp. 289–300). San Francisco: Code for America Press.
Pereira Filho, Nivanildo, e Lima, Rogerio de Araujo. (2024). “Governança Algorítmica e Políticas Públicas: Desafios Éticos e Impactos da Inteligência Artificial na Tomada de Decisão Governamental”. *RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar*, v. 6, n. 1, p. e616051. DOI: 10.47820/recima21.v6i1.6051. Disponível em: https://recima21.com.br/recima21/article/view/6051. Acesso em: 05 out. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v6i1.6051
Posetti, J., e Bontcheva, K. (2020). “Desinfodemia: descifrando la desinformación sobre el COVID-19”. Paris: UNESCO. Disponível em: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/disinfodemic_deciphering_covid19_disinformation_es.pdf. Acesso em: 12 set. 2025.
Rouvroy, A., e Berns, T. (2013). “Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation. Le disparate comme condition d’individuation par la relation?”. *Réseaux*, n. 177, p. 163–196. Disponível em: https://www.cairn.info/revue-reseaux-2013-1-page-163.htm. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163
Sandrini, Camila Taciana, e Pereira, Camila Gourgues. (2025). “Governança de Inteligência Artificial no Brasil: Panorama Regulatório Atual”. *Ciências Sociais Aplicadas*, v. 29, n. 149. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ni10202508072123. Acesso em: 05 out. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ni10202508072123
Stenslie, S. (ed.). 2022. Intelligence Analysis in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168157
Volkoff, Vladimir. (2004). *Pequena História da Desinformação: Do Cavalo de Tróia à Internet*. Curitiba: Ed. Vila do Príncipe.
Yeung, Karen. 2018. “Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation”. Regulation & Governance, Hoboken, v. 12, n. 4, p. 505–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Wachter, S., e Mittelstadt, B. (2019). “A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI”. *Columbia Business Law Review*. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Marjori Klinczak, Jose Simao de Paula Pinto

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Declaración de datos
-
Los datos de investigación están incluidos en el propio manuscrito