The Brazilian Intelligence Agency (ABIN) in the Geopolitics of Resources and Climate:
Security of Strategic Supply Chains in the Context of Semiconductors, Energy, and Critical Minerals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58960/rbi.2026.21.307Keywords:
strategic intelligence, resource geopolitics, climate security, global supply chains, Brazilian Intelligence Agency (ABIN)Abstract
The transformation of the international order has shifted security concerns from strictly military domains toward economic, technological, and environmental dimensions. Global supply chains have become strategic instruments of power, particularly in semiconductors, energy, and critical minerals. This article examines the role of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (ABIN) in identifying and mitigating strategic vulnerabilities related to resource geopolitics and climate change. Based on recent scholarly literature (2018–2025) and documentary analysis of Brazilian strategic guidelines, it argues that Brazil’s distinctive position lies in the centrality of environmental assets within contemporary sovereignty. The article proposes the concept of Strategic Environmental Intelligence as an analytical framework integrating geopolitical monitoring, economic security, and climate risk anticipation, contributing to debates on intelligence reform and strategic autonomy.
Downloads
References
Agência Brasileira de Inteligência (ABIN). 2024. "Institucional." Brasília: ABIN. https://www.gov.br/abin (acessado em 17 de fevereiro de 2026).
Brasil. 1988. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal.
Brasil. 1999. Lei nº 9.883, de 7 de dezembro de 1999. Institui o Sistema Brasileiro de Inteligência e cria a Agência Brasileira de Inteligência – ABIN. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 8 de dezembro de 1999. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9883.htm (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
Brasil. Ministério de Minas e Energia. 2022. Plano Nacional de Mineração 2050. Brasília: MME. https://www.gov.br/mme (acessado em 15 de janeiro de 2026).
Brasil. Ministério de Minas e Energia. 2023. Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 2032. Brasília: EPE/MME. https://www.epe.gov.br (acessado em 17 de fevereiro de 2026).
Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE). 2023. Minerais críticos e estratégicos para o Brasil. Brasília: CGEE.
European Commission. 2020. Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards Greater Security and Sustainability. Bruxelas: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu (acessado em 8 de dezembro de 2025).
Farrell, Henry, e Abraham L. Newman. 2019. "Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion." International Security 44 (1): 42–79.
Fundo Monetário Internacional (FMI). 2023. World Economic Outlook 2023. Washington, DC: IMF. https://www.imf.org (acessado em 16 de janeiro de 2026).
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2021. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2023. Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). Genebra: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch (acessado em 8 de janeiro de 2026).
Kelly, Phil. 2019. Classical Geopolitics: A New Analytical Model. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Keohane, Robert O., e Joseph S. Nye. 2012. Power and Interdependence. 4ª ed. Nova York: Pearson.
Machado, Lia Osório. 2019. "Geopolítica dos recursos naturais e soberania na Amazônia." Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 62 (2).
Mazzucato, Mariana. 2021. Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. Londres: Allen Lane.
Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC). 2024. "Brazil Trade Data 2024." https://oec.world (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2021. Global Supply Chains: Efficiency and Risks in the Context of COVID-19. Paris: OECD.
Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU). 2022. Climate Security Mechanism Report. Nova York: UN. https://www.un.org (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Economist. 2021. "The Semiconductor Shortage and the Future of Supply Chains." Londres, 15 de maio de 2021. https://www.economist.com (acessado em 22 de novembro de 2025).
The New York Times. 2022. "How the Global Chip Shortage Affected the World Economy." Nova York, 2 de julho de 2022. https://www.nytimes.com (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
U.S. Department of Energy. 2023. Critical Materials Assessment 2023. Washington, DC: DOE. https://www.energy.gov (acessado em 8 de dezembro de 2025).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2024. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024. Reston: USGS. https://www.usgs.gov (acessado em 22 de novembro de 2025).
World Bank. 2020. Minerals for Climate Action: The Mineral Intensity of the Clean Energy Transition. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org (acessado em 8 de dezembro de 2025).
World Economic Forum. 2024. Global Risks Report 2024. Genebra: WEF. https://www.weforum.org (acessado em 17 de janeiro de 2026).
Zakaria, Fareed. 2023. "The New Geopolitics of Energy Transition." Foreign Affairs 102 (3).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pedro Velasco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Data statement
-
The research data is contained in the manuscript