Política Externa Brasileira e Inteligência de Estado: Desafios para uma Agenda Crítica de Pesquisa

Antonio Carlos Lessa

doi:10.58960/rbi.2026.21.276

Autores

Antonio Carlos Lessa Universidade de Brasilia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8593-8708

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58960/rbi.2026.21.276

Palavras-chave:

Agenda de Pesquisa, Politica Externa Brasileira, Inteligencia de Estado

Resumo

Este artigo analisa a relação entre a Política Externa Brasileira e a Inteligência sob a perspectiva da integração de políticas. Trata-se de um estudo conceitual de caráter analítico-interpretativo cujo objetivo é organizar categorias analíticas, explicitar dilemas institucionais e propor uma agenda de pesquisa. Argumenta-se que a articulação entre diplomacia e Inteligência representa um desafio estratégico para o Brasil. A análise considera a desejabilidade, a factibilidade e os limites dessa integração, destacando entraves institucionais, culturais e operacionais. O estágio atual é caracterizado como limitado, com baixa coordenação e escassa accountability. Com base nesse diagnóstico, propõe-se uma agenda de pesquisa crítica e interdisciplinar, organizada em quatro eixos: diagnóstico, dinâmica política, desenho institucional e impacto na efetividade da ação externa.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abbott, Andrew. 2004. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.

ABIN (Agência Brasileira de Inteligência). 2024. “Inteligência na Democracia – ABIN 25 Anos. Brasília: Agência Brasileira de Inteligência. https://www.gov.br/abin/ptbr/centrais-de-conteudo/inteligencia-na-democracia/inteligencia-nademocraciaabin-2024.pdf.”

Agência Brasil. 2023. “Polícia Federal abre inquérito para investigar denúnciasde espionagem pela ABIN.” March 16, 2023. https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/geral/noticia/2023-03/pf-abre-inquerito-para- investigar--denuncias-de-espionagem-pela-abin.

Allison, Graham, and Philip Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

Brasil. 2016. Decreto nº 8.7S3, de 2S de junho de 201C. Fixa a Política Nacional de Inteligência. Diário Oficial da União, June 30, 2016.

Brasil. 2023. Decreto nº 11.CS3, de C de setembro de 2023. Dispõe sobre a organização e o funcionamento do Sistema Brasileiro de Inteligência. Diário Oficial da União, September 8, 2023.

Briassoulis, Helen. 2004. “Policy Integration for Complex Policy Problems: What, Why and How.” Paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies – Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin, December.

Bruneau, Thomas C., and Florina Cristiana Matei, eds. 2012. The Routledge Handbook of Civil–Military Relations. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203105276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203105276

Candel, Jeroen J. L. 2017. “Holy Grail or Inflated Expectations? The Success and Failure of Integrated Policy Strategies.” Policy Studies 38 (6): 519–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1337090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1337090

Candel, Jeroen J. L. 2021. “The Expediency of Policy Integration.” Policy Studies 42(4): 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1634191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1634191

Candel, Jeroen J. L., and Robbert Biesbroek. 2016. “Toward a Processual Understanding of Policy Integration.” Policy Sciences 49 (3): 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y

Casarões, Guilherme, and Rogério de Souza Farias. 2021. “Brazilian Foreign Policy under Jair Bolsonaro: Far-Right Populism and the Rejection of the Liberal International Order.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 34 (3): 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1780123.

Cason, Jeffrey W., and Timothy J. Power. 2009. “Presidentialization, Pluralization, and the Rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining Change in Brazilian Foreign Policy Making in the Cardoso–Lula Era.” International Political Science Review 30 (2): 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512109102432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512109102432

Cejudo, Guillermo M., and Philipp Trein. 2023. “Policy Integration as a Political Process.” Policy Sciences 56: 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09494-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09494-6

Cepik, Marco. 2021. “Intelligence and Security Services in Brazil: Reappraising Institutional Flaws and Political Dynamics.” The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs 23 (1): 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800992.2020.1868784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23800992.2020.1868784

Cepik, Marco, and Sara D. Möller. 2017. “National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.” Brazilian Political Science Review 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700010001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700010001

Crosby, Barbara C., and John M. Bryson. 2010. “Integrative Leadership and the Creation and Maintenance of Cross-Sector Collaborations.” The Leadership Ǫuarterly 21 (2): 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003

Faria, Carlos Aurélio Pimenta de. 2008. “Opinião pública e política externa: insulamento, politização e reforma na produção da política exterior do Brasil.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 51 (2): 80–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292008000200006

Faria, Carlos Aurélio Pimenta de. 2012. “O Itamaraty e a política externa brasileira: do insulamento à busca de coordenação.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55 (1): 311–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292012000100009

Farias, Rogério de Souza. 2021. “Foreign Policy Planning in Brazil (1949–2018): From Developmentalism to Institutional Erosion.” Hague Journal of Diplomacy 16 (4): 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10076

Farias, Rogério de Souza, and Antonio Carlos Lessa. 2023. “From Great Expectations to Dwindling Status: Brazilian Diplomacy’s Response to Post–Cold War Upheavals.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Diplomatic Reform and Innovation, edited by Paul Webster Hare, Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez, and Kenneth Weisbrode, 213–234. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_10

Farias, Rogério de Souza, and Haroldo Ramanzini Júnior. 2015. “Horizontalização da política externa brasileira: desafios analíticos e empíricos.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 58 (2): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500201

Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503

Flyvbjerg, Bent, Todd Landman, and Sanford Schram, eds. 2012. Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511719912

Garcia, Denise. 2014. “Not Yet a Democracy: Establishing Civilian Authority over the Security Sector in Brazil—Lessons for Other Countries in Transition.” Third World Ǫuarterly 35 (3): 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893489

Gerring, John. 2018. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gill, Peter, and Mark Phythian. 2018. Intelligence in an Insecure World. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422246

Howlett, Michael, M. Ramesh, and Anthony Perl. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

Howlett, Michael, Ishani Mukherjee, and Jeremy Rayner. 2023. The Routledge Handbook of Policy Design. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163954

Hudson, Valerie M. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman C Littlefield.

Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Johnson, Loch K., and James J. Wirtz, eds. 2004. Strategic Intelligence: Windows into a Secret World. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.

Kingdon, John W. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

Lowenthal, Mark M. 2017. Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CǪ Press.

Matei, Florina Cristiana, and Carolyn Halladay, eds. 2019. The Conduct of Intelligence in Democracies: Processes, Practices, and Cultures. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626378216

Peters, B. Guy. 2005. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism”. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.

Peters, B. Guy. 2015. Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Peters, B. Guy. 2018. “The Challenge of Policy Coordination.” Policy Design and Practice 1 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946

Repetto, Fabián. 2003. “La necesaria articulación de las políticas públicas.” Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia 27: 115–130.

Richelson, Jeffrey T. 2012. The United States Intelligence Community. 6th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Saraiva, Miriam Gomes. 2022. “Brazil’s South American Policy under Bolsonaro: From Regional Leadership to Political Fragmentation.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 65 (1): e012. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202200102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202200224

Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Dvora Yanow, eds. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science. London: Routledge.

Sil, Rudra, and Peter J. Katzenstein. 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01359-0_1

Stempel, Jonathan D. 2010. “Diplomacy and Intelligence.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.151

Tosun, Jale, and Achim Lang. 2017. “Policy Integration: Mapping the Different Concepts.” Policy Studies 38 (6): 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239

Underdal, Arild. 1980. “Integrated Marine Policy: What? Why? How?” Marine Policy DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(80)90051-2

4 (3): 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(80)90055-7.

Wirtz, James J. 2007. “The Intelligence–Policy Nexus.” In Strategic Intelligence, Volume 1: Understanding the Hidden Side of Government, edited by Loch K. Johnson, 139–150. New York: Praeger Security International.

Wu, Xun, Michael Howlett, and M. Ramesh, eds. 2018. Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 54675-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9

Yanow, Dvora, and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. 2014. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315703275

Zaverucha, Jorge. 2008. “De FHC a Lula: A militarização da Agência Brasileira de Inteligência.” Revista de Sociologia e Política 16 (31): 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782008000200011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782008000200013