Guerra cognitiva e operações cibernéticas de influência
Vieses cognitivos como tática de combate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58960/rbi.2024.19.252Palavras-chave:
Guerra Cognitiva, viés cognitivo, guerra de informação, operações de influência, operações cibernéticas de influênciaResumo
O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o conceito de guerra cognitiva e demonstrar como a exploração instrumental das vulnerabilidades cerebrais, como os vieses cognitivos, em operações cibernéticas de influência é basilar para o termo. Em dezembro de 2020, a OTAN divulgou relatório sobre a guerra cognitiva, sugerindo a adição de um sexto domínio operacional, o domínio cognitivo, aos já estabelecidos domínios terrestre, marítimo, aéreo, espacial e cibernético. A crescente atenção dos formuladores de estratégia e dos tomadores de decisão ao caos informacional e à degradação do ambiente social e institucional tem aumentado a demanda por compreensão sobre a guerra cognitiva. É necessário, assim, que o Brasil também discuta o conceito de forma crítica e autônoma.
Downloads
Referências
Alves, B. W., Macedo, B. V. de, & Roahny, L. (2022). O que é "guerra híbrida"? Notas para o estudo de formas complexas de interferência externa. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De Defesa, 9(1), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v9n1.2022.75282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v9n1.2022.75282
Ambros, Christiano Cruz. “Guerra Cognitiva e militarização da neurociência: programas de pesquisa em neurotecnologias dos Estados Unidos e da China”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Defesa 11, no 1 (9 de agosto de 2024). https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v11i1.75409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26792/rbed.v11i1.75409
Arquilla, John, and David Ronfeldt. 2001. “The Advent of Netwar (Revisited).” In Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy, edited by John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt. Santa Monica, USA: Rand Corporation.
Bastian, Nathaniel D. (2019) “Information Warfare and Its 18th and 19th Century Roots”. Ciber Defense Review. https://cyberdefensereview.army.mil/CDR-Content/Articles/Article-View/Article/2017786/information-warfare-and-its-18th-and-19th-century-roots/. Acesso em 18/04/2019.
Baughman, Josh. How China Wins the Cognitive Domain. China Aerospace Studies Institute. 2023. Disponível em:h ttps://www.airuniversity.af.edu/CASI/Articles/Article-Display/Article/3273289/how-china-wins-the-cognitive-domain/ Acesso em 17/04/2023.
Binding, M. (2019). What Is the ‘Technology of the Colour Revolutions,’and Why Does It Occupy Such a Prominent Place in Russian Threat Perceptions?. http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/vol19/no4/PDF/CMJ194Ep54.pdf.
Bonfanti, M., (2019). An Intelligence-based approach to countering social media influence operations, in: Romanian Intelligence Studies Review. National Intelligence Academy, Bucharest
Boswinkel, Lotje; Finlayson, Neil; Michaelis, Johs; Rademaker, Michel. Weapons of mass influence: Shaping atitudes, perceptions and behaviours in today’s information warfare. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. 2022. Disponível em: https://hcss.nl/report/weapons-of-mass-influence-information-warfare/. Acesso em: 18/04/2023.
Brasil. Doutrina da Atividade de Inteligência. Aprovada pela Portaria GAB/DG/ABIN/CC/PR nº1.205, 27 de novembro de 2023. Brasília: Abin, 2023.
Charon, P., & Vilmer, J. B. J. (2021). Chinese influence operations: A machiavellian moment. Report by the Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM), Paris, Ministry for the Armed Forces.
Claverie, B., & Du Cluzel, F. (2022). The Cognitive Warfare Concept. Innovation Hub Sponsored by NATO Allied Command Transformation, 2. https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf.
Cluzel, Fraçois Du. “Cognitive Warfare, A Battle For The Brain”. In Claverie, B; Prébot, B.; Buchler, N.; Cluzel, F. (Eds.) Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance. First NATO scientific meeting on Cognitive Warfare. 2021. www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/Cognitive%20Warfare%20Symposium%20-%20ENSC%20-%20March%202022%20Publication.pdf.
Cluzel, François Du. Cognitive Warfare. NATO Innovation Hub. 2020. www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf.
Cordey, S. Cyber Influence Operations: An Overview and Comparative Analysis. [s.l.] ETH Zurich, 31 out. 2019. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/382358>. Acesso em: 20 set. 2023.
Dawson, Jessica. Microtargeting as Information Warfare. The Cyber Defense Review, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 63–80, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26994113. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024.
Dawson, Jessica. Microtargeting as Information Warfare. The Cyber Defense Review, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 63–80, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26994113. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024.
Derleth, James. “A Guerra de Nova Geração Russa”. Military Review, 2021.
Dourado, Maria Eduarda Buonafina Franco. Entre guerra hníbrida e Gibridnaya Voyna: uma análise comparada da atuação dos Estados Unidos e da Rússia no conflito ucraniano (2014-2015). Dissertação (Mestrado em Relações Internacionais) Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, 2020.
Duarte, É. E. Estudos estratégicos. Curitiba: InterSaberes, 2020
EUA. Field Manual (FM) 100-6, Information Operations (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996), acesso em 24 de junho de 2024, https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=437397.
Giordano, James "Neuroscience in irregular warfare.," June 2017. US Naval War College, Newport, RI.: Invited plenary: Center for Irregular Warfare and Groups, US Naval War College, Newport, RI..
Giordano, James. "Neuroscience and neurotechnology as leverage for strategically latent influence upon the 21st century global stage (plenary session)," April 2017. Joint Base Andrews, MD: SMA Strategic Influence Conference.
Giordano, James. "Neuroscience and technology as weapons of mass disruption," September 2018. Ft. Belvoir, VA: US Army INSCOM, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Giordano, James. "Operationalizing neuro-cognitive science in national intelligence and security (plenary session)," October 2015. The Pentagon, Arlington, VA: Operational Aspects of Neuro-Cognitive Science. Strategic Multilayer Assessment Group, Joint Staff.
Giordano, James. "Weaponizable brain science: An international perspective and need for engagement," April 2018. Joint Base Andrews, MD.: Strategic Multilayer Assessment Annual Conference, Joint Base Andrews, MD..
Giordano, James. (2017). Neuroscience and technology as weapons on the twenty-first century world stage. In: Aviles19 W, Canna S. (eds.) Influence in an Age of Increasing Connectedness. p. 58-66. Department of Defense; Strategic Multilayer Assessment Group- Joint Staff/J-3/Pentagon Strategic Studies Group
Giordano, James. Neurobiological perspectives of, and contributions to national security. In: Cabayan H. et al. (eds.) National Security Challenges: Insights from Social, Neurobiological and Complexity Sciences. Department of Defense; Strategic Multilayer Assessment Group- Joint Staff/J-3 (July 2012).
Giordano, James. Emerging Neuroscience and Technology (NeuroS/T): Current and Near Term Risks and Threats to Nato Biosecurity. NATO Innovation Hub. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/NATO%20NeuroST%20Report%20FINAL.pdf. Acesso em 17/04/2023.
Green, James. (2015). Cyber Warfare. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/1642665/cyber-warfare-a-multidisciplinary-analysis-pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761565-1
Hansen, Flemming Splidsboel (2021). When Russia wages war in the cognitive domain. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 34(2), 181-201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2021.1990562
Heuer, Richards J. Psychology of intelligence analysis. Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1999.
Hoffman, Frank G. 2007. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, USA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
_____. 2018. “Examining Complex Forms of Conflict: Gray Zone and Hybrid Challenges.” PRISM 7, no. 4: 31-47.
Howard, P. N., Ganesh, B., Liotsiou, D., Kelly, J., & François, C. (2018). The IRA, social media and political polarization in the United States, 2012-2018.
Huhtinen, A. Different types of information warfare. In: Encyclopedia of Digital Government. IGI Global, 2007. p. 310-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch047
Ilnistky A. M., & Losev, A. V. (2018). Ideology of Victory: What Will be the War of the 21st Century Like. War of Ideologies: Decision-Making Technology. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2018/10/19/12026917.shtml
Jin H, Hou L-J, Wang Z-G (2018). Military brain science – How to influence future wars. Chinese J Traumatology. 1 21: 277-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.01.006
Jindal, Divyanshu (2023) “India in the Age of Cognitive Warfare”. India Foundation. Disponível em https://indiafoundation.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Divyanshu-Jindal-combined-Final-48-pages.pdf.
Kahneman, Daniel. Fast and slow thinking. Allen Lane and Penguin Books, New York, 2011.
Kahneman, Daniel; Slovic, Paul; Tversky, Amos (Ed.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge university press, 1982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Kania, Elsa B. (2017) “China’s Rise in Artificial Intelligence and future military capabilities”. Center for a New American Security. www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep16985.6.pdf
Knyazev, N., & Oosterhuis, H. (2022, August). The bandwagon effect: not just another bias. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (pp. 243-253). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3539813.3545142
Korybko, Andrew. Guerras híbridas: das revoluções coloridas aos golpes. São Paulo: Expressão Popular, p. 119, 2018.
Kuehl, Daniel T. 2009. “From Cyberspace to Cyberpower: Defining the Problem.” In Cyberpower and National Security, edited by Franklin D. Kramer, Stuart Starr and Larry K. Wentz, 26–28. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
Kyrychok A.P. (2017) “The history of the information warfare concept”. Science and Education a New Dimension. Humanities and Social Sciences, V(21), I.: 130. https://seanewdim.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-history-of-the-information-warfare-concept-A.-P.-Kyrychok.pdf. Acesso em 18/04/2023.
Manoilo, Andrey Viktorovich (2021). "Modern-Day Information Warfare and Hybrid War Operations."
Maschmeyer, Lennart, Alexei Abrahams, Peter Pomerantsev, and Volodymyr Yermolenko. 2023. “Donetsk Don’t Tell – ‘Hybrid War’ in Ukraine and the Limits of Social Media Influence Operations.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, May, 1–16. doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2211969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2211969
Mccreight, R. (2022) “Neuro-cognitive Warfare: Inflicting Strategic Impact via Non-Kinetic Threat”. Small Wars Journal. https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/neuro-cognitive-warfare-inflicting-strategic-impact-non-kinetic-threat. Acesso em 18/04/2023.
Mendonça, Thaiane Caldas. (2017) “Pacificação e contrainsurgência: as Forças de Pacificação do Exército Brasileiro nos Complexos do Alemão e da Penha”. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos Estratégicos de Defesa e Segurança). Universidade Federal Fluminense, Instituto de Estudos Estratégicos.
Michael, Kobi; Kupperwasser, Yossi. (2019) “Cognitive Intelligence: The Theoretical Aspect” In The Cognitive Campaign: Strategic and intelligence Perspectives, editado por Yossi Kuperwasser; David Siman-Tov. Institute for National Security Studies. https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Michael-and-Kuperwasser.pdf
Minton, Natalie, "Cognitive Biases and Reflexive Control" (2017). Honors Theses. 729.
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/729
Neto, Ricardo Borges Gama. Guerra Cibernética/Guerra Eletrónica-Conceitos, Desafios e espaços de interação. Revista Política Hoje, v. 26, n. 1, p. 201-217, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51359/1808-8708.2017.9180
Pace, Rodrigo Metropolo; Coelho, Emilio Reis. Information as a Weapon of Mass Disruption: From Information Disorder to Cognitive Warfare. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval. Rio de Janeiro, v. 28, n. 3, p. 1-16, setembro/dezembro 2022. www.revistadaegn.com.br/index.php/revistadaegn/article/view/1030/1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21544/2359-3075.v28n3.g
Paikowsky, Deganit; Matania, Eviatar. Influence Operations in Cyber: Characteristics and Insights. IN Kuperwasser, Yossi; Siman-Tov, David (Eds). The Cognitive Campaign: Strategic and intelligence Perspectives. (2019) Institute for National Security Studies. https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Memo197_e_compressed.pdf
Pamment, James; Nothhaft, Howard; Fjällhed, Alicia. Countering information influence activities: The state of the art. 2018.
Pocheptosov, G. (2016). Five New Trends in the Transformation of the Information War: Future Approaches. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://psyfactor.org/psyops/infowar47-2.htm
Schmidt-felzmann, Anke. More than ‘just’disinformation. Russia’s information operations in the Nordic region. Information Warfare—New Security Challenge for Europe, 2017.
Schmitt‐Beck, R. (2015). Bandwagon effect. The international encyclopedia of political communication, 1-5.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc015
Shinji, Yamaguchi; Masaaki, Yatsuzuka; Rira, Momma. China’s Quest for Controlo f the Cognitive Domain and Gray Zone Situations. NIDS China Security Report. 2023. Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies, 2022. http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/publication/chinareport/pdf/china_report_EN_web_2023_A01.pdf.
Stiennon, Richard. A short history of cyber warfare. In: Cyber Warfare. Routledge, 2015. p. 7-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761565-2
Takagi, Koichiro (2022) War on the Rocks. “The Future of China’s Cognitive Warfare: Lessons from the War in Ukraine”, 22 de julho de 2022. https://warontherocks.com/2022/07/the-future-of-chinas-cognitive-warfare-lessons-from-the-war-in-ukraine/.
Volkov, A. (2020). «Cognitive Wars»: Features Of The Geopolitical Conflict In 21st Century. In I. Elkina, & S. Ivanova (Eds.), Cognitive - Social, and Behavioural Sciences - icCSBs 2020, vol 1. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences (pp. 281-288). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.20121.32] DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.20121.32
Walker, Márcio. Operações de informação: névoa de conceitos. Maringá, PR: Viseu, 2024.
Walton, Calder (2019) “Spies, Election Meddling and Disinformation: Past and Present”. Brown Journal of World Affairs. Fall/Winter 2019. Volume XXVI, Issue I.
Wang, T.-L. (2020). Does Fake News Matter to Election Outcomes?: The Case Study of Taiwan’s 2018 Local Elections. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 67–104. https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.2.67
Wanless, Alicia; Pamment, James. How do you define a problem like influence?. Journal of Information Warfare, v. 18, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2019.
Wither, James K. Making sense of hybrid warfare. Connections, v. 15, n. 2, p. 73-87, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.15.2.06
Yun, Minwoo; Kim, Eunyoung. “Cyber Cognitive Warfare as an Emerging New War Domain and Its Strategies and Tactics” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, v.34, no.4, (2022): pp.603 – 631. https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/86763
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Christiano Cruz Ambros
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
